Kathmandu, January 2026 — Corruption within Nepal’s corporate ecosystem is increasingly being exposed as systemic rather than incidental, with multiple government oversight bodies documenting persistent malpractice across financial administration, immigration processes, and land management. Findings from the Office of the Controller and Auditor General (OCG), the Department of Immigration (DOI), and the Land Revenue Department point to entrenched networks of collusion between public officials, intermediaries, and corporate actors—undermining transparency, rule of law, and public trust.
Despite repeated investigations and public disclosures, accountability remains limited, raising serious questions about governance reforms and the state’s ability to regulate corporate conduct effectively.
Audit Findings Reveal Massive Financial Irregularities
The Office of the Controller and Auditor General has repeatedly reported unresolved financial irregularities running into hundreds of billions of rupees across government bodies. A significant portion of these irregularities involves agencies that directly interface with the private and corporate sectors through procurement, licensing, taxation, and service delivery.
Audit reports consistently highlight unauthorized expenditures, payments without proper documentation, delayed revenue recovery, and weak internal controls. Many of these irregularities remain unsettled for years, effectively normalizing financial non-compliance.
Senior auditors have warned that the lack of enforcement following audit findings creates a permissive environment in which public officials and corporate entities operate with little fear of consequence. While audits are conducted annually, corrective actions—such as fund recovery, departmental penalties, or criminal prosecution—are often delayed or avoided altogether.
This culture of impunity, experts say, enables corporate entities to exploit regulatory loopholes, inflate contracts, and manipulate public spending with minimal oversight.
Immigration Corruption and Corporate Facilitation
Corruption within the Department of Immigration has emerged as a critical vulnerability in Nepal’s governance framework, particularly through the misuse of visit visas and foreign employment channels. Investigations have revealed that immigration officials, in coordination with brokers and travel agencies, facilitated illegal overseas travel in exchange for bribes.
In several cases, senior immigration officials were accused of orchestrating visa approvals for individuals who did not meet legal requirements, allowing them to bypass scrutiny at international airports. Payments were allegedly collected through intermediaries, turning immigration control into a revenue-generating enterprise.
These practices often intersect with corporate and recruitment networks that profit from sending workers abroad through irregular channels. Victims—many of them migrant workers—reported paying large sums for travel documents, only to face exploitation, detention, or deportation in destination countries.
The scandal exposed how discretionary authority, weak digital oversight, and insufficient internal monitoring within the DOI create opportunities for corruption that extend beyond individual wrongdoing and into organized networks.
Land Revenue Offices at the Center of High-Value Corruption
Land administration remains one of the most corruption-prone sectors in Nepal, with Land Revenue Offices repeatedly implicated in bribery, document manipulation, and illegal land transfers. Investigations by anti-corruption agencies have uncovered cases involving government land being unlawfully converted into private property through forged records and abuse of authority.
Several high-profile cases have revealed the involvement of senior officials, political figures, and business interests in manipulating land ownership records for financial gain. In some instances, officials were accused of demanding large bribes to process land registration, ownership transfer, or valuation approvals.
Land corruption carries particularly severe consequences due to the high economic value of real estate and its central role in corporate investment, banking collateral, and urban development. When land records are compromised, disputes multiply, legal certainty erodes, and public confidence in property rights collapses.
Anti-corruption investigators note that land-related cases often take years to prosecute, during which illegally acquired property changes hands multiple times, complicating recovery and accountability.
Bribery at the Company Registrar’s Office
Corruption affecting corporate formation and compliance has also drawn public attention. Investigations into the Company Registrar’s Office revealed widespread allegations of open bribery, where business registrations and filings allegedly required unofficial payments to be processed efficiently.
Applicants reported that without paying intermediaries or office insiders, even routine procedures were delayed. Rather than addressing institutional failures, authorities responded by transferring staff members, a move critics argue merely relocates corruption instead of eliminating it.
Business associations warn that such practices increase the cost of doing business, discourage formalization, and disproportionately harm small and medium enterprises that lack political connections or financial leverage.
Common Patterns Across Institutions
Despite operating in different sectors, corruption cases across the OCG, DOI, and Land Revenue Department reveal striking similarities:
-
Discretion without accountability: Officials retain wide decision-making authority with minimal oversight.
-
Weak enforcement: Investigations often lead to transfers or suspensions rather than convictions.
-
Political shielding: High-ranking individuals frequently evade prosecution due to political influence.
-
Opaque systems: Manual processes and complex regulations create space for intermediaries and rent-seeking behavior.
Anti-corruption experts argue that corruption persists not because of a lack of laws, but due to selective enforcement and institutional tolerance.
Impact on Nepal’s Business Environment
The implications of systemic corruption are far-reaching. Investors cite regulatory unpredictability and governance risks as major deterrents. Legitimate businesses face unfair competition from entities that secure approvals through bribery rather than compliance. Public revenues decline as financial leakages persist, limiting the government’s ability to fund essential services.
Moreover, public trust in state institutions continues to erode. When corruption is seen as routine rather than exceptional, citizens and businesses alike begin to view informal payments as unavoidable, further entrenching the problem
Reforms and the Road Ahead
Authorities have announced reforms including digitization of land records, automation of immigration systems, and tighter financial controls. Anti-corruption bodies continue to file cases against officials and corporate actors alike. However, governance analysts caution that technical reforms alone are insufficient.
Meaningful change, they argue, requires political commitment to prosecute high-level offenders, transparent follow-up on audit findings, protection for whistleblowers, and institutional independence for oversight agencies.
As Nepal seeks economic growth and increased foreign investment, addressing corruption within its corporate and regulatory ecosystem is no longer optional. Without sustained accountability and reform, corruption will continue to undermine governance, distort markets, and weaken democratic institutions.
